[disorders Moon Young-soo reporter] The National Office of Education, which is in favor of the introduction of domestic disorders disorders, has been reduced from seven to three. On the other hand, the number of education offices that chose prudent increased from six to 11. It is known that there is a lack of scientific basis for the cord of disorders with game disorders.
According to the data submitted by the National Assembly's Office of Education (Democratic Party), a member of the National Assembly's Office of Education and Tourism, on the 16th, Gangwon, Jeonnam, and Jeju Office of Education among the 17 school districts nationwide announced their position. Daejeon, Incheon, and Chungnam, three school districts, have opposed their positions. The remaining 11 school districts were in a position to be cautious in introducing.
The survey is in contrast to 2019, when the rate was higher. At the time, seven school districts, including Seoul, Sejong, and Jeonnam, were in favor, and six education offices, including Gyeonggi and Gyeongbuk, were cautious, and the remaining four school districts expressed their opposition.
Representative Lee Sang-heon evaluated the situation in which the prosecution weakened was encouraging. This is because the Ministry of Education's position is never small in the discussion of the introduction of game disorders disorders as most of the symptoms of game use disorders presented by the medical community are concentrated in the youth. In addition, the position of the local education office is important as each education office is recognized for the autonomy of the local government's education administration under the Act on Local Education.
According to the survey, most of the opposite perspectives were concerned about the stigma effect. If you define a game disorder as a disease, students can be stigmatized that there is a problem, which can deepen school maladjustment. In particular, this support as a patented man is likely to be separated from peer students and more likely to lead to greater psychological pressure. Therefore, the opposite side says that rather than defining game use disorders as a disease, the psychological factors and social and educational environments at the basis of immersion and dependence should be changed first.
In favor, he mainly paid attention to the therapeutic effect. Active treatment and protection measures for students with pathological poisoning are needed. Management of game disorders can be systematically managed by the disease.
The prudence was not enough to collect opinions in general. The pros and cons are so severe that the social consensus has not yet been achieved. There were also opinions that the government's policy direction was not determined and there was no definition of game use disorders or that there was no clear standard to objectify it. On the other hand, Busan and Chungnam Office of Education said that it is necessary to consider the positive aspects of the game.
Representative Lee Sang-heon said, There is no clear reason for the introduction of the disease code only among various behavioral disorders such as shopping addiction and mobile phone addiction. There is no left.
Comments
Post a Comment