In the first trial of a litigation against the Cultural Physical Education Tourism, Music Copyrights should be set according to the situation of domestic new OTT companies, not Netflix, in the first trial.
Wave, Teabing, Watcha side, the Letters, in the appropriate trial held at the Seoul Administrative Court on the 13th, said the Netflix with Netflix with foreign capital (regardless of our broadcast history context). Domestic OTT operators said they have to pay for copyright fees.
The Broadcasting Communications Commission and the Department of Science and Technology Information The Department of Information and Communications Departments are looking at the history of the Korean cable broadcasting, and they are worried about how to define OTTs. Combined system, which is based on the original shipping,
Previously, music copyrights used in OTT content have been built based on OTT service providers and private contracts between Korean Mussels Association. Last year, the Music Properties Association proposed a specific collection rate, and the lawyer was fermented by this year, with approval of the relevant amendment. It will be up to 1.9995% by 2026, starting from 1.5% of the rate of application rate this year. On the other hand, the OTT side is a position that is doubled in a doubling rate compared to the conventional broadcasting agent retention.
The character of the law is lower than the rate of accrucing the amendment, which is lower than the rate of approval of the amendment, he said, he said, he said, It is lower than the rate that the music critical association is proposed in the first place. It is a lot of users, I refused.
When the previous VOD service (consumers) want to see (consumers), I have a certain amount of money, and now OTT is different from the streaming service, but it is different from the terrestrial content method, I have a good rate than Netflix rate, but I have a compatible with Netflix.
Netflix is reported to be a 5-percent of sales of 2.5% of sales to a music critical association.
In addition, the OTT side was concerned about that copyright fees could be dual for the copyright rate collection regulations.
On the other hand, the character side is that the manuscript claims to be in a specific drama, when the first writing, and the composition of the composition, it is a dual package, when it pays the copyright fees from the composer, and the production rights are different from the production and distribution relationships. I also have a danger of duplicate payment, but the effect is minimal.
The 'OTT Music Safety Countermeasures' gathered by OTT companies shall hold a press conference on February to hold a press conference, and I would like to take a lawsuit if I do not want to reinariates. However, the last 4-day win-win consultative 3rd meeting is also running a parallel line.
The primary argument is a place to confirm the two sides, and on October 29, the secondary variations scheduled to be on October 29, in the secondary variation date, in the secondary variant, the state of stakeholders will be based on additional data, such as the associated conference record, such as the associated conference record.
Comments
Post a Comment